PEGASES PROPERTIES P. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT - CC-2(3), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147/148 were invalid as no substantive addition was made in any other hand. Consequently, the protective additions made by the AO were quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a builder, treated unsold flats as stock-in-trade. The AO made additions on account of deemed rental income on these unsold flats, relying on High Court decisions. The CIT(A) upheld these additions.
What were the issues?
Whether deemed rental income on unsold stock-in-trade flats can be added when no substantive addition is made elsewhere, and the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated without substantive additions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153C,Section 143(3),Section 23,Section 147,Section 148,Section 69A,Section 271AAB,Section 271(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd. v. CIT381 citing373 ITR 673 · 2015 · SC
- Lalji Haridas v. ITO238 citing43 ITR 387 · 1961 · SC
- CIT v. Ansal Housing Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd.208 citing354 ITR 180 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Neha Builders Pvt. Ltd.129 citing296 ITR 661 · 2008 · HC
- CIT v. Ansal Housing and Construction37 citing389 ITR 373 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- Mangla Homes Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO28 citing325 ITR 281 · 2010 · HC
- Suresh K. Jajoo v. ACIT27 citing39 SOT 514 · 2010 · ITAT
- M.P. Ramachandran v. DCIT13 citing32 SOT 592 · 2009 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH & SHRI LALIET KUMAR
PER BENCH:
These appeals in ITA Nos.350/Mum/2021 to 352/Mum/2021 for A.Yrs.2016-17 to 2018-19 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-48, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-48/IT- 21/DCCC-2(3)/2019-20 dated 29/01/2021 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.153C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax
2 ITA Nos.350-352/Mum/2021 M/s. Pegasus Properties Pvt. Ltd., Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 26/01/2019 by the ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(3), Mumbai (hereinafter referred
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026