VIJAY KUMAR SINGHANIA,KOLKATA vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOLKATA-5, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The order was pronounced in open court.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263. The assessee's counsel requested the appeal be dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal filed by the assessee should be dismissed as withdrawn based on the assessee's counsel's submission.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(KZ) & Shri Rajesh Kumar
Per Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President (KZ):- The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata-5 dated 23.03.2021 passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act for A.Y. 2016-17.
The ld. Counsel for the assessee, at the very outset, submitted that this appeal be dismissed as withdrawn. He has made a writing to this effect in the order-sheet. In view of the statement of the ld. Assessment Year: 2016-2017 Vijay Kumar Singhania Counsel for the assessee at the Bar, we dismiss this appeal as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on November 03, 2022. Sd/- Sd/- (Rajesh Kumar) (Rajpal Yadav) Accountant Member Vice-President (KZ) Kolkata, the 3rd day of November, 2022 Copies to : (1) Vijay Kumar Singhania, C/o. Subash Agarwal & Associates, Advocates, Siddha Gibson, 1, Gibson Lane, Suite-213, 2nd Floor, Kolkata-700069
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026