AJAY KUMAR GUPTA,FARIDABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1, FARIDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for the assessment year 2011-12. The assessee later requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA SHRI AMIT SHUKLASHRI SHRI
PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU VP VP : VP This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A), Faridabad dated 19th November, 2019.
The learned counsel for the assessee, vide email dated 8th 2. December, 2020 has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
Learned Senior DR has no objection.
2 ITA-9605/Del/2019
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Above decision was announced in the presence of both the sides on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 10th December, 2020.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026