Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE
PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-19, Chennai, dated 30.03.2022 and pertains to assessment years 2012-13 &2015-16.
At the time of hearing, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the tax effect in these appeals filed by the Revenue is less than the monetary limit of ₹50,00,000/- fixed by the CBDT to file appeals by the Revenue before the Tribunal as per the CBDT Circular No.17/2019, dated 08.08.2019. The ld. DR fairly conceded the submissions made by the ld. Counsel for the assessee. Being so, the Revenue authorities are & 516/Chny/2022 for AYs 2012-13 & 2015-16 M/s.Texmo Industries :: 2 ::
precluded from filing the appeals before the Tribunal, since the tax effect is less than ₹50,00,000/- in these appeals and the appeals filed by the Revenue are liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed. However, the Department is at liberty to seek recall of the above, if it is found by the department that the said appeals are covered by exceptions given in Claue-10 of Instruction No.3 of 2018 issued by CBDT.
As per the ground No.2.2, it is observed that there is no audit objection for AYs 2012-13 & 2015-16. However, it is mentioned that there was an audit objection for AY 2011-12. Since, there was no audit objection for AYs 2012-13 & 2015-16, we are of the opinion that the case is not covered by Clause-10(c) of the Instruction No.3 of 2018.
In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed.
Order pronounced on the 18th day of August, 2022, in Chennai.