RITESH KUMAR,FARIDABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 11(2), FARIDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2712/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 December 2020AY 2014-152 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee requested withdrawal of the appeal filed for assessment year 2014-15. This was due to opting to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal could be withdrawn due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “C” BENCH: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI K.N.CHARY

Hearing: 30.12.2020Pronounced: 30.12.2020

PER G.S. PANNU, VP : This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2014-15 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A), Faridabad dated 08.02.2018.

2.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter dated 27.12.2020, received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

1.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing in the presence of both parties on 30th December, 2020.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →