SHRI SIDDHESHWAR SHIV MANDIR TRUST,YAVATMAL vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to comply with the second notice issued by the CIT(E). However, considering the facts and in the interest of justice, the matter was restored to the CIT(E) for one final opportunity to the appellant.
What were the facts?
The appellant trust applied for regular registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(Exemption) issued notices seeking clarification and details regarding the genuineness of activities. The appellant failed to comply with the second notice, leading to the rejection of its application.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in rejecting the registration application due to non-compliance with notices, and if the Tribunal should grant a further opportunity to the appellant.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12A,Section 12A(1)(ac),Section 12AB,Section 12AB(1)(b)(i),Section 17A(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “B”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & MS. ASTHA CHANDRA
आदेश / ORDER
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The captioned appeal at the instance of appellant is directed against the order framed by ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune dated 17.10.2024 denying grant of registration u/s.12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( in short ‘the Act’).
Tersely, the facts of the case are that the appellant filed application on Form No.10AB under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act for grant of regular registration on 12.04.2024. In order to verify the genuineness of activities of the appellant, the ld. CIT (Exemption) issued a notice through ITBA portal on 05.06.2024 calling upon the appellant to file certain information/clarification. The appellant filed the requisite details. However, the ld.CIT(E) issued another notice to the appellant on 04.10.2024 pointing out certain discrepancies (para 4 of the impugned order). There was no compliance from the side of appellant to such notice. In the circumstances, the ld.CIT(E) rejected the application filed by the appellant, thereby cancelling the provisional registration granted to it by observing as under :
“6. Since, the appellant has not furnished any explanation to the discrepancies communicated to it, it is presumed that the appellant has nothing to say in the matter.
7. Considering the above facts discussed in the show notice and discrepancies noticed and also that the appellant has not complied with the provisions of section 12AB(1)(b)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as well as the provisions of Rule 17A(2) of Income Tax Rules, 1962 in spite giving sufficient opportunities, the undersigned is unable to draw any satisfactory conclusion about the genuineness of activities of the appellant and compliance of requirements of any other law for the time being in force by the appellant as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects.
In view of the above, the application filed by the appellant is hereby rejected and the provisional registration granted on 28/05/2021 under section 12AB read with section 12A(1)(ac) (vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is hereby cancelled.”
Aggrieved appellant is in appeal before the Tribunal in the present appeal assailing the impugned order denying grant of registration u/s.12A of the Act.
When the appeal was called for, none appeared on behalf of the appellant despite due service of notice of hearing. We therefore proceed to dispose of the appeal with the able assistance from the ld. Departmental Representative exparte qua the appellant.
Ld. Departmental Representative submitted that ample opportunities were granted by the ld. CIT(E) and the appellant could not avail them, therefore, the order of the ld. CIT(E) be upheld.
We have heard the ld. Departmental Representative and perused the record placed before us. We find the appellant in response to the first notice issued by the ld. CIT(E) has filed the requisite details. However, when the ld. CIT(E) issued another notice asking the appellant to clarify regarding certain discrepancies found in the above submissions, the appellant failed to comply to the same. Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the ld. CIT(E) with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the appellant to substantiate its case by filing requisite details and decide the issue as per fact and law after giving due opportunity of being heard to the appellant. The appellant is also hereby directed to make its submissions, if any, before the ld. CIT(E) on the appointed date without seeking any adjournment under any pretext, failing which the ld. CIT(E) is at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. We hold and direct accordingly. The grounds raised by the appellant are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeals of the appellant is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on this 13th day of February, 2025.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026