KHANDESH GOSEWASHRAMANTARGAT GOSHALA,DHULE vs. CIT EXEMPTION PUNE, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appellant's non-compliance was due to reasons beyond their control and that granting one more opportunity in the interest of justice would be appropriate.
What were the facts?
The appellant, a Trust, applied for regular registration under section 12A(1)(ac) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application for non-compliance with notices.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the registration application without affording adequate opportunity due to non-compliance beyond the appellant's control.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “A”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
आदेश / ORDER
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The captioned appeal at the instance of appellant is directed against the order framed by ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune dated 17.10.2024 denying grant of registration u/s.12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( in short ‘the Act’).
Succinctly, the facts of the case are that the appellant is a Trust, filed application on Form No.10AB under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act for grant of regular registration on 27.06.2024. In order to verify the genuineness of activities of the appellant, the ld. CIT (Exemption) issued a notice through ITBA portal on 25.07.2024 calling upon the appellant to file certain information/clarification. There was no compliance from the side of appellant. In the circumstances, the ld.CIT(E) rejected the application filed by the appellant, thereby cancelling the provisional registration granted to it.
Aggrieved appellant is now in appeal before the Tribunal in the present appeal assailing the impugned order denying grant of registration u/s.12AA of the Act.
Ld. Counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant’s case could not be represented before the ld.CIT(E) for the reasons beyond the control of the appellant. Given an opportunity, the appellant is now in a position to submit the details called for by the ld.CIT(E). Therefore, it is prayed for setting aside the impugned order and remanding the same to the file of ld.CIT(E) foe denovo adjudication.
Ld. Departmental Representative submitted that ample opportunities were granted by the ld. CIT(E) but the appellant did not avail the same, therefore, the order of the ld. CIT(E) be upheld.
We have heard both the sides and perused the record placed before us. We find there was no compliance by the assessee before the ld.CIT(E) and the ld.CIT(E) rejected the application filed by the assessee for want of details. Before us, it is the submission of the assessee that there was no compliance from the side of assessee to the notices issued by ld.CIT(E) which was due to the reasons beyond control of the assessee and therefore, one more opportunity may be granted to the assessee to submit the requisite details as called for by the ld.CIT(E). Considering the totality of the facts of the case, submissions made by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of the ld. CIT(E) with a direction to grant an opportunity to the appellant to substantiate its case by filing requisite details and decide the issue as per fact and law after giving due opportunity of being heard to the appellant. The appellant is also hereby directed to make its submissions, if any, before the ld. CIT(E) on the appointed date without seeking any adjournment under any pretext, failing which the ld. CIT(E) is at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. We hold and direct accordingly. The grounds raised by the appellant are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the appellant is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on this 04th day of March, 2025.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026