DCIT, CIRCLE-8, , PUNE vs. POSCO INDIA PUNE PROCESSING CENTER PVT. LTD., PUNE

ITA 1002/PUN/2024Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 March 2025AY 2011-12Bench: DR.MANISH BORAD (Accountant Member), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)16 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) correctly allowed the assessee's claim for adjustment of foreign exchange gain/loss, as the assessee consistently followed accounting standards. The Tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)'s decision regarding the adjustment of excess provision for slow-moving inventory, preventing double taxation.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 5,23,00,000/- related to foreign exchange gain by the CIT(A). The assessee also filed cross objections challenging reassessment proceedings, which were not pressed.

What were the issues?

Whether reassessment proceedings were validly initiated and whether the assessee's claim for foreign exchange gain/loss and adjustment of slow-moving inventory provision was correctly allowed.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 143(3),Section 43A,Section 115JB

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “B”, PUNE

Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE

For Appellant: Shri V. Krishna V. Gujarathi
For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Hearing: 07.01.2025Pronounced: 06.03.2025

PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :

The captioned two appeals filed by the Revenue and Cross Objections filed by the assessee relate to Assessment Years 2010- 11 and 2011-12 and are directed agai

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →