BK EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE SOCIETY,NASHIK vs. ITO(E), WARD 1(1) , NASHIK
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 2,51,000/- received from Dr. Bhagwan Nivrutti Elmane as the assessee successfully explained the nature and source. For the donation of Rs. 1,10,000/- from Mr. Bhagwan Dnyanoba, treated as anonymous donation, the Tribunal held that only the amount in excess of Rs. 1 lakh is taxable @30% under section 115BBC.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, furnished its return of income for A.Y. 2021-22. The AO made additions under section 68 of the Act for cash donations received from Dr. Bhagwan Nivrutti Elmane and Mr. Bhagwan Dnyanoba. The CIT(A) partly upheld these additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the additions made under Section 68 for cash donations were justified, and if not, whether Section 115BBC applies to the remaining donation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 68,Section 11(1),Section 115BBC,Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 250,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 131(1)(b),Section 115BBC(1)(i)(B)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “SMC”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The captioned appeal at the instance of assessee pertaining to A.Y. 2021-22 is directed against the order dated 03.05.2014 framed by National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi u/s.250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) arising out of the Assessment order dated 18.12.2022 passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144B of the Act.
2
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust and registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 vide registration certificate dated 30.05.2011. Return of income for A.Y. 2021-22 furnished on 19.10.2022. Audit Report on Form No.10AD which was due
2 BK Edu
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026