SHREENATH MHASKOBA CREDIT CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD.,PUNE vs. THE PCIT, PUNE-4, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer took a plausible view after considering the assessee's reply and relevant case laws. Therefore, the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was not justified.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative credit society, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for interest income earned on investments. The PCIT invoked Section 263, holding the Assessing Officer's order allowing the deduction as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue.
What were the issues?
Whether the PCIT was justified in invoking Section 263 to revise an order where the AO had taken a plausible view on the allowability of deduction under Section 80P, even if it might be prejudicial to revenue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P(2)(a)(i),Section 80P(2)(d),Section 263,Section 56,Section 143(3),Section 144B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO1,283 citing322 ITR 283 · 2010 · SC
- Pr. CIT v. Totagars1,074 citing395 ITR 611 · 2017 · HC
- Prakash Nath Khanna v. CIT111 citing266 ITR 1 · 2004 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & MS ASTHA CHANDRA
PER R. K. PANDA, VP :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 06.02.2025 passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by the Ld. PCIT, Pune-4, relating to assessment year 2020-21. 2. Although a number of grounds have been raised by the assessee, however, these all relate to the order of the Ld. PCIT in setting aside the order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) of the Act by invoking the provisions of section 263 of the Act.
2
Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a Co-operative Credit Society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Society Act, 1960 and carrying on business of provi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(a)(i)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- The Development Multipurpose Credit &… vs ITO Ward 2 (4), Porbandar, GujaratITA 458/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hislop College Employees Cooperative Credit… vs ITO Ward 2(3), NagpurITA 184/NAG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026