SHETKARI SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL,BEED vs. DCIT(E0 CIRCLE, AURANGABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that once an amount is determined and paid under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme, the Assessing Officer cannot pass a rectification order under Section 154 as the scheme provides finality. The CIT(A)'s order was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme for settlement of dues. After paying the determined amount, the Assessing Officer passed a rectification order under Section 154, raising an additional demand. The CIT(A) confirmed this rectification order.
What were the issues?
Whether a rectification order under Section 154 can be passed after the assessee has settled the dispute under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and paid the determined amount.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 30.09.2024 passed by Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :- “1. On the facts and circumstance prevailing in the case, the Honorable CIT Appeal (NFAC) has erred in confirming the order passed u/s 154 rws 143(3) of the Income-tax Act dated 21.10.2021 passed by Dy.CIT Exemption Aurangabad on 21.10.2021 in as much as he did not considered the grounds of appeal in fair and judicious manner.
On the facts and circumstance previeling in the case, the Honorable CIT Appeal (NFAC
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026