BNY MELLON INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS (INDIA) PVT LTD,PUNE vs. I.T.O , CPC BANGALURU, BANGULURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the intimation under Section 143(1) merges with the assessment order under Section 143(3). Since no additions were made and the returned income was accepted, the issue of Section 234C interest was deemed infructuous. However, due to lack of clarity on the computation of interest, the matter was remitted to the AO.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged the levy of interest under Section 234C of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) rejected the additional ground regarding this interest, stating it lacked jurisdiction. The assessment order under Section 143(3) accepted the returned income, making no additions.
What were the issues?
Whether interest under Section 234C is leviable when the returned income is accepted and no additions are made. Whether the CIT(A) erred in rejecting the additional ground concerning Section 234C interest due to jurisdictional reasons.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE “A” BENCH : PUNE
Before: SHRI MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER : MANISH BORAD, AM These appeals at the instance of the same assessee are directed against the separate orders ADDL/JCIT (Appeals)-4, Kolkata [“CIT(A)”] evenly dated 28/10/2024 passed u/s.250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“Act”) which are arising out of assessment order passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144B of the Act, dated 02/12/2022 and intimation u/s.143(1) of the Act dated 26/07/2023 for the Assessment Years (AY) 2021-22 & 2022-23 respectively.
As the issues raised in the instant two appeals are mostly common and pertains to the same assessee, these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order for
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 234C
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Sarvjeet Singh Through Legal Heir Manjit… vs ITO Ward 1(1), AlwarITA 355/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026