SHRI GANADHIPATI GANDHARACHARYA KUNTIUSAGAR VIDYA SODH SONSTHA,KOLHAPUR vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, PUNE, KOLHAPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals, citing genuine medical reasons for the delay. It held that the disallowance of exemption under section 11 was incorrect as Form 10B was filed before the processing of the return under section 143(1).
What were the facts?
The assessee, a public trust registered under sections 12A and 80G, filed its income tax returns and audit reports (Form 10B) belatedly for assessment years 2018-19 to 2021-22. The Assessing Officer disallowed exemption under section 11 due to the late filing of Form 10B.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of exemption under Section 11 is justified when the audit report (Form 10B) is filed belatedly but before the processing of the return under Section 143(1).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji3,926 citing167 ITR 471 · 1987 · SC
- CIT v. Gujarat Oil & Allied Industries195 citing201 ITR 325 · 1993 · HC
- CIT v. Shahzadanand Charity Trust62 citing96 Taxmann 494 · 1997 · HC
- CIT v. Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Iron & Steel Market Committee30 citing58 Taxmann.com 253 · 2015 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI MANISH BORAD & MS. ASTHA CHANDRA
PER BENCH : The above four appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the separate orders dated 05.03.2024, 28.06.2024, 28.06.2024 and 07.03.2024 of the Ld. Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Gurugram [“Addl./JCIT(A)”] pertaining to Assessment Years (“AYs”) 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22 respectively. Since identical issues are involved in all the four appeals, for the sake of convenience, all these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026