ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that additions made in unabated years require incriminating material, which was not sufficiently demonstrated by the Revenue. The Tribunal also found that the CIT(A)'s relief was subject to AO's verification, which was subsequently done.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) which granted relief to the assessee society. The assessee society also filed cross-objections. The appeals and cross-objections were consolidated for hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether additions in unabated years are permissible without incriminating material, and whether the CIT(A) correctly granted relief after the AO's subsequent verification.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11,Section 11(4A),Section 11(5),Section 13,Section 69,Section 132,Section 153A,Section 143(3),Section 142(1),Section 143(2),Section 12A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd.2,379 citing149 Taxmann 399 · 2023 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA
PER BENCH : These appeals filed by the revenue and cross objections(“ C.Os.”) filed by M/s. Ravi Rishi Educational Society (“the assessee”), feeling aggrieved by the separate orders passed by the C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022 Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Hyderabad (“Ld.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026