OAKTON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CENTRE (I) PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-16(2), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal remanded the issue of excluding certain companies from the comparables list to the AO/TPO for verification of functional comparability. It also directed the AO/TPO to follow the DRP's directions regarding another comparable company and provided specific guidance for benchmarking interest on trade receivables.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in software development services, appealed against the final assessment order which included upward adjustments to the arm's length price (ALP) of international transactions. The adjustments were made based on the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).
What were the issues?
The key issues involved the selection of comparable companies for transfer pricing analysis, benchmarking of interest on trade receivables, and the application of adjustments for provisions for doubtful debts and working capital.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 92CA(3),Section 144C(5),Section 92B,Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 271AA,Section 271BA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(13)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Cotton Naturals (I) (P.) Ltd.273 citing55 Taxmann.com 523 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Bharat General Reinsurance Co Ltd.202 citing81 ITR 303 · 1971 · HC
- DCIT v. Quark Systems (P.) Ltd.179 citing4 ITR (Trib) 606 · 2010 · ITAT
- 7. CIT v. MR.P.FIRM.MUAR127 citing56 ITR 67 · 1965 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Tata Autocomp Systems Ltd.119 citing374 ITR 516 · 2015 · HC
- (CIT v. C. Parakh & Co. (India) Ltd.73 citing29 ITR 661 · 1956 · SC
- VVF Ltd. v. DCIT I (supra) and DCIT Vs. Tech Mahindra Ltd.54 citing46 SOT 141 · 2011 · ITAT
- VVF Ltd. v. Dy. CIT38 citing12 Taxmann.com 132 · 2011 · ITAT
- Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd. v. ACIT, Central Circle-6(1) Chennai23 citing46 SOT 112 · 2014 · ITAT
- Shiva Industries & Holdings Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income17 citing11 Taxmann.com 404 · 2011
- R.B. Jessaram Fatehchand v. CIT15 citing81 ITR 409 · 1971 · HC
- 109 Taxmann.com 4812 citing109 Taxmann.com 48 · 2019 · ITAT
- CIT v. The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.7 citing301 CTR 642 · 2018
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA
PER MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA, A.M. : These appeals are filed by M/s. Oakton Global Technology Services Centre (India) Private Limited (“the assessee”), feeling aggrieved with the final assessment order of Learned Assessing Officer ("Ld. AO") passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 92CA(3) r.w.s. 144C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'), as per the direction of Learned Dispute Resolution Panel, Bangalore (“Ld. DRP”) on 05.10.2017 & 26.10.2018 for A.Ys. 2013-14 & 2014-15 respectively. Since these appeals are inter-related, th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 92CA(3)
- Addi. CIT, Special Range-1, New Delhi vs Aon Services India P.Ltd, New DelhiITA 5988/DEL/2019[2008-09]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2008-09
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Quantium Analytics Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(3), HyderabadITA 1336/HYD/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Ba Continuum India Private Limited… vs DCIT, Circle -1(1), HyderabadITA 205/HYD/2021[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026