SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY DEVASTANAM,JAMALAPURAM vs. ITO., EXEMPTION WARD-1(3), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 10(23BBA) of the Income Tax Act is applicable to the administrative body or authority constituted under the Endowment Act, not to the income of the temple itself. The temple may still be eligible for exemption under Sections 11 and 12 if registered.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals with a delay, which was condoned by the Tribunal based on a High Court order excluding the time spent in litigation. The core issues revolve around the applicability of Section 10(23BBA) and the taxability of donations received by the temple.
What were the issues?
Whether Section 10(23BBA) exempts the income of the temple or only its administrative body, and the taxability of donations received by the temple.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ DB-B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-Shri Manjunatha, G.
Per Vijay Pal Rao, Vice President These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against two separate orders, both dated 19/02/2024 of the learned CIT (A)-NFAC Delhi, for the A.Ys. 2013-14 & 2016-17. 2. There is a delay of 160 days in filing the present appeals. The assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay. The learned AR of the assessee has submitted that during the pendency of the appeal before the learned CIT (A), the assessee filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court for issui
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(23BBA)
- Arulmigu Sivasubramaniaswamy Thirukoil… vs ITO, Exemptions Ward, SalemITA 934/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed24 Jun 2026AY 2018-19
- Pracheen Shri Aggarwal Digamber Jain… vs ITO, Ward-62(1), DelhiITA 8142/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed26 May 2026AY 2018-19
- Sri Someshwara Laxmi Narasimha Swamy Temple… vs ITO., Ward-3, WarangalITA 326/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Ujjaini Mahakali Devasthanam, Secunderabad vs ITO., Exemption Ward-1(3), HyderabadITA 1385/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed12 Nov 2025AY 2016-17
- Ujjaini Mahakali Devasthanam, Secunderabad vs ITO., Exemption Ward-1(3), HyderabadITA 1384/HYD/2025[20216-17]Status: Disposed12 Nov 2025
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026