EXEL RUBBER PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to fulfill the conditions laid down under Section 149(1)(b) and Section 151 of the Income Tax Act for reopening the assessment. The sanction for reopening was granted mechanically without proper satisfaction.
What were the facts?
A search and seizure operation was conducted on the assessee company and its group concerns, leading to the discovery of unaccounted cash receipts. Based on this, the Assessing Officer reopened assessments for multiple years, including AY 2015-16, by issuing notices under Section 148.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the validity of the notice issued under Section 148 and the proper compliance with the conditions laid down in Sections 149 and 151 for reopening assessments after a search operation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 149,Section 151
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad DB-B‘Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice- & Shri Manjunatha, G.
Per Bench: These five appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate orders dated 20/06/2025, 21/06/2025, 23/06/2025, 25/06/2025 and 15/07/2025 respectively of the learned CIT (A)-11, Hyderabad for the A.Ys.2015-16 to 2019-20 arising from the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act, pursuant to the search & seizure operations dated 04/01/2023 in case of Exel Group of Companies including the assessee for the A.Ys 2014-15 to 2019-20 respectively. Since common issued are raised in these group of five a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026