PITTI HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment notice issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer was invalid. Furthermore, since no additions were made on the primary issue for reopening, the reassessment order was not valid.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal challenges the validity of a reassessment notice issued by a jurisdictional Assessing Officer instead of a faceless Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer also did not make any additions on the specific issue for which the assessment was reopened.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were the validity of reassessment notices issued by a non-faceless AO and whether an AO can make additions on issues other than those forming the basis of reopening when no additions are made on the original issue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Jet Airways (I) Ltd.694 citing331 ITR 236 · 2011 · HC
- CIT v. Shri Ram Singh180 citing306 ITR 343 · 2008 · HC
- Giridhar Gopal Dalmia Vs.Union of India v. Ors725 citing156 Taxmann.com 478 · 2024
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA
PER VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT :
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 16.01.2025 of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the Asst. Year 2018-19. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :
Ground No.1 is general in nature and does not require any specific adjudication.
Ground Nos.2 & 3 are regarding validity of Notice issued u/s.148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) by the juri ictional Assessing Offic
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026