MOHAMMAD AMJAD ALI SAHAJI,HABRA, ASHOKENAGAR vs. WARD 50(2) KOLKATA, INCOME TAX
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not determine the quantum of advance tax payable or the applicability of Section 208. It noted the assessee's claim that no advance tax was due. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the case for fresh adjudication, allowing the assessee to file an advance tax exemption application and present further evidence after being given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee made large cash deposits during the demonetization period for AY 2017-18 but failed to file a return of income, leading to an assessment by the AO. The Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal without addressing its merits, on the grounds of non-compliance with Section 249(4)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for not paying advance tax or filing an exemption application.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal for non-compliance with advance tax payment under Section 249(4)(b) without deciding on the merits of the case or determining the applicability and quantum of advance tax.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 144,Section 142(1),Section 249(4),Section 249(4)(b),Section 208,Section 209,Section 210
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI SONJOY SARMA & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
order
: January 13th, 2025 ORDER
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The present appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to the AY 2017-18 is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ld. 'CIT(A)'] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’) dated 23.02.2024 arising out of the assessment order framed u/s 144 of the Act dated 10.12.2019.
More judgments on Section 142(1)
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Subhash Chand Saini, Jaipur vs ITO Ward, Behror, BherorITA 36/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gaurav Jiteshbhai Joshi, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1000/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026