Facts
The revenue preferred appeals against the separate orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for AY 2014-15 & 2015-16. The assessee's counsel informed the Tribunal about CBDT Circular No. 9/2024, which revised the monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department to reduce litigation.
Held
The Tribunal observed that the tax effect in the present appeals was less than Rs. 60,00,000/-, which falls below the revised monetary limit for appeals to the Appellate Tribunal as per CBDT Circular No. 9/2024. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Department were dismissed in limine as being contrary to the Department's own policy decision. The Tribunal clarified that the Revenue could move the Tribunal for recalling the orders if the tax effect is later found to be higher or the appeals are otherwise maintainable.
Key Issues
Whether the revenue's appeals were maintainable before the ITAT, given that the tax effect was below the monetary limit stipulated by CBDT Circular No. 9/9024 for filing departmental appeals.
Sections Cited
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]
ORDER / आदेश Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, JM: These are the appeals preferred by the revenue against the separate orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-26, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 27.08.2024 for the AY 2014-15 & 2015-16.
At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the CBDT has issued a Circular No. 9/2024 dated 17.09.2024, whereby the monetary limits for filing of appeal by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and High Courts & 2164/Kol/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Pushpak Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and SLP before Supreme Court have been increased as a measure for reducing Litigation. The revised monetary limits laid down in para-2 of this Circular are as follows:
Before Appellate Tribunal Rs. 60,00,000/- 2. Before High Court Rs. 2,00,00,000/- 3. Before Supreme Court Rs. 5,00,00,000/-
In the present case, the tax effect by the revenue is less than Rs.60,00,000/-. We note that this appeal had been filed by the revenue on 28.10.2024 and since the tax effect is within the monetary limit for filing appeals before Tribunal, in view of the Circular of CBDT (supra) at the first place, Revenue should not have preferred this appeal. In view of the above, we hold that the appeal filed by the Department, against the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A), is contrary to the policy decision of the Department and as such the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed in limine.
As a matter of caution, we observe that if the Revenue finds at a later point of time that the tax effect in the appeal is more than Rs.60 lakhs or despite low tax effect, the appeals of the revenue are maintainable, the revenue is at liberty to move this Tribunal for recalling of these orders. In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed. Order is pronounced in the open court on 23rd January, 2025
Sd/- Sd/- (Rajesh Kumar/राजेश कुमार) (Pradip Kumar Choubey /�द�प कुमार चौबे) Accountant Member/लेखा सद�य Judicial Member/�या�यक सद�य Dated: 23rd January, 2025 SM, Sr. PS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant- ACIT, Kolkata 2. Respondent – Pushpak Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., 101, Siddha Point, Park Street, Kolkata-700016 3. Ld. CIT(A)-26, Kolkata 4. Ld. Pr. CIT- , Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail)