MANOJ KUMAR JAJU,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 36(1), KOLKAKTA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that as per the scheme and relevant guidance, appeals are deemed withdrawn upon issuance of the certificate. The assessee requested withdrawal, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was filed against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2017-18. The assessee had availed the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 91(2),Section 92(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI SONJOY SARMA & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
order
: February 11th, 2025 ORDER
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)”] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for AY 2017-18 dated 11.08.2024, which has been passed against the order u/s 143(3) of the Act, dated 17.12.2019.
As per S. No. 10 of the Guidance Note 1/2024 on provisions of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 dated 15th October, 2024, it is mentioned that as per section 91(2) of the Scheme, after filing of declaration, appeals before ITAT/CIT(A)/JCIT(A) are deemed to be withdrawn from the date of issue of certificate by the Designated Authority. Further as per section 91(3) of the Scheme, the taxpayer is required to withdraw appeals and furnish proof thereof along with intimation of payment u/s 92(2) of the Scheme. Since the assessee has requested for withdrawal of the appeal, he is permitted to withdraw the same and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, if the subsequent facts warrant that the appeal should be heard on merits, the assessee shall be at liberty to file a Miscellaneous Application for restoration of the appeal.
More judgments on Section 92(2)
- Eranthus Developers Private Limited, Mumbai vs DCIT, Circle 14(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8997/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- DCIT, Circle- 1(1)(1), International… vs Continental Engineering Corporation, GurgaonITA 7781/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed12 Feb 2026AY 2014-15
- DCIT, Circle- 1(1)(1), International… vs Continental Engineering Corporation, GurgaonITA 2327/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed12 Feb 2026AY 2013-14
- Cbre Limited, Hong Kong vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 3786/DEL/2023[AY 2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Jan 2026
- Vikash Agarwal, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 61(3), KolkataITA 1896/KOL/2024[2014-2015]Status: Disposed10 Dec 2025AY 2014-2015
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026