BAJRANG LAL AGARWAL,JALPAIGURI vs. D.C.I.T., CC - 3(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the CIT(A)'s dismissal due to non-prosecution and the assessee's undertaking to cooperate. In the interest of justice, it decided to restore all appeals to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, allowing the assessee to raise additional grounds.
What were the facts?
The assessee's original assessment was completed under Section 153C/143(3). Later, an assessment was set aside under Section 263, adding back interest income from fixed deposits in Bhutan, leading to a penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The CIT(A) dismissed the appeals for non-compliance, prompting the assessee to file an affidavit explaining non-receipt of notices due to old age and reliance on an accountant.
What were the issues?
Whether appeals dismissed by CIT(A) for non-compliance should be restored, and the validity of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) related to unoffered interest income from Bhutan fixed deposits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153C,Section 143(3),Section 263,Section 271(1)(c),Section 5(1)(c),Section 274,Section 274(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey&Shri Sanjay Awasthi]
ORDER / आदेश Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, JM:
All the appeals preferred by the assessee against the separate orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-21, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. CIT(A)] dated 22.10.2024 for AY 2007-08 to 2011-12 respectively. Since issues are to 2530/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2007-08 to 2011-12 Bajrang Lal Agarwal common in all the appeals hence taken up together for disposal. We shall take in as a lead case.
Brief facts of the case of the assessee are that the assessment of the assessee was completed u/s 153C/ 143(3) on 21.12.2015 when fixed deposit of Rs. 1,95,00,000/- in Bhutan had been duly considered by the AO. During the course of assessment, it was contended that according to Bhutan Income Tax Act, 2001 interest earned on fixed deposit by individual is not taxable income under personal income tax. Since no interest of FD is taxable, the assessee did not offer any income being interest on fixed deposit. The said assessment was set aside u/s 263 and in pursuant to the order passed u/s 263 interest on FD for Rs. 13,65,000/- had been added back on accrual basis. In penalty proceedings, it was submitted through e-mail that income accrues or arise in Section 5(1)(c ) referred to income accrues or arises not in India but outside in India. It was contended that no income has been concealed by the assessee in the return, however, the penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)( c) for Rs. 4,09,500/- has been levied.
Aggrieved by the said penalty order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) wherein the appeal of the assessee has been dismissed by the Ld. CIT(A) as there was no response on behalf of the assessee during the appellate proceedings.
Being aggrieved and dissatisfied the assessee preferred an appeal before us.
The Ld..R instead of arguing into the merit of the case has only prayed that as there was no concealment of income. The Ld. A.R has filed an affidavit that the assessee will co-operate if the appeal of the assessee be restored into the file of the Ld. CIT(A).
The D.R though supports the impugned order did not raise any objection in remitting the appeal of the assessee to the file of Ld. CIT(A).
Upon hearing the submission of the counsel of the respective parties, we have perused the order of Ld. CIT(A) in all the appeals and find that appeal of the assessee has been dismissed by the Ld. CIT(A) as there was non-compliance by the assessee before him The assessee has filed an affidavit which is as below: to 2530/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2007-08 to 2011-12 Bajrang Lal Agarwal 7. It is a fact all the appeals of the assessee have been dismissed on account of non- prosecution and assessee filed an Affidavit of undertaking that the assessee will co- operate in proceeding if the appeal of the assessee be restored into file of the Ld. CIT(A). Keeping in view, the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A), considering the affidavit filed by the assessee and for the interest of justice, we are inclined to restore all the appeals of the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A) with a direction to pass afresh order with a liberty to assessee to raise an additional ground as per law.
In the result, all the appeal filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026