NANDI FASHION PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1)(4), SURAT
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The Senior Departmental Representative did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order confirming a penalty. During the hearing, the assessee's authorized representative requested permission to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw their appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA No.2439/Ahd/2016, Nandi Fashion Pvt. Ltd IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI CM.GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P.MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER 31T.3.F./L.T.A No.2439/AHD/2016 faerruradf/ Assessment Year 2012-13 Nandi Fashion Pvt. Ltd, 1-17, Surat Super Yarn Park, Hathuran Mangrol, Surat 394125 PAN: AACCN6574H 3rdlareff Appellant Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1)4), Surat. 4rreff/Respondent Shri Rasesh Shah, CA fagRaf-13k /Assessee by TST4at3k /Revenue by Shri O.P Meena, Sr. D.R: 25.01.2018 2.01.2018 TTdr-hrarw/ Date of hearing: 3quiruirAaro/Pronouncement date_ H48 [O RDER PER O_P_MEENA_ACCQUIANI MEMBER:
This appeal by the assessee filed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1 , Surat, dated 31.08.2016 confirming the penalty of Rs.10,000 / - 0/s.271(1J(b) of the Act: 2. When the appeal was called for hearing, letter dated 25.01.2018 signed by the Id.AR for the assessee firm was placed before Us, wherein the assessee sought permission to withdraw the appeal: The Id.Sr DR has not raised any objection for withdrawal of appeal: 3. In view of the foregoing, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn: 4. The order pronounced in the open Court on 25.01.2018. - (CM: GARGY (O.P. MEENA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Hl Surat, f4alic Dated: 25 .01-13 Copy of order forwarded to- Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT / CIT (A)/ITAT (DR) /Guard file of ITAT. By order Assistant Registrar, Surat
More judgments on Section 271(1)(b)
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1195/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1194/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1193/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Laxmi Narain Kesarwani, Delhi vs DCIT, Central Circle-20, New DelhiITA 4432/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Laxminarain Kesarwani, Delhi vs DCIT, Central Circel-20, New DelhiITA 4431/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026