SHRI PRAVINCHANDRA ISHWARLAL RANA,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), ( NOW WARD-1(2)(4)), SURAT
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order confirming a penalty. During the hearing, the assessee's representative requested permission to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn based on the assessee's request.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA No.2157/Ahd/2015, Pravinchandra Ishwarlal Rana IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI CM.GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI OPMEENAACCQUNTANT MEMBER 3T.31.H,/LT.A No.21S7VAHD/2015 @ejoradt/ Assessment Year 2008-09 Shri Pravirichandra Ishwarlal Rana, Vs. 14/782, Hlalpati The Income Tax Officer, Colony , Mahalaxmi Ward 2(3), Sheri No.2, Umarwada, Surat; Surat. PAN: ABEPR9239F ardalreff Appellant 9aeff/Respondent fuRalafi3izt /Assessee by Shri PM Jagaseth, CA TToT4-h3iit /Revenue by Shri O.P Meend, Sr. D.R; HTashartu/ Date of hearing: 3quyur-Rraro/Pronouncement date 25.01.2018 25.01.2018 H48 /O R DER PER Q_EIMEENAACCQUIANT MEMBER:
This appeal by the assessee filed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-Il, Surat, dated 05.05.2015 confirming the penalty of Rs.10,000/- 0/s.271(1)(b) of the Act, 2 When the appeal was called for hearing, a letter dated 24.01.2018 signed by the Id.AR for the assessee firm was placed before Us, wherein the assessee sought permission to withdraw the appeal: The Id.Sr DR has not raised any objection for withdrawal of appeal: 3 In view of the foregoing, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn: 4 The order pronounced in the open Court on 25.01.201 8. Sd| S7 (C.M: GARG) (O.P. MEENA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER y/ Surat, faalfa5 Dated:95-9/-12 Copy: of order forwarded to- Assessee/AO /Pr. CIT / CIT (A)/ITAT ITAT. (DR) /Guard file of By order 8L Assistant Regi TetregSdlap 311437 3ikv ~frtu 37dl3;Ta.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(b)
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1195/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1194/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1193/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Laxmi Narain Kesarwani, Delhi vs DCIT, Central Circle-20, New DelhiITA 4432/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Laxminarain Kesarwani, Delhi vs DCIT, Central Circel-20, New DelhiITA 4431/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026