SAMVARDHANA MOTHERSON INTERNATIONAL LTD(NOW AMALGAMATED WITH MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD., DELHI vs. ACIT,CIRCLE22(2) NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
Following a precedent from the Hon'ble Madras High Court, the tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. However, it granted the assessee liberty to seek restoration of the appeal if the declaration filed under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2024 is not accepted by the Revenue for any reason.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax for Assessment Year 2018-19 under Sections 144C read with Section 143(3). During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2024, and submitted the required forms and evidence.
What were the issues?
What is the appropriate course of action for the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal when an assessee files a declaration under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme during the pendency of their appeal?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “H”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA & SHRI VIMAL KUMAR
PER VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The appeal filed by the Assessee is against order dated 30.06.2022 of the Learned Assistant Commissioner of Income- Tax, Circle 22(2), New Delhi (hereinafter referred as ‘Ld. AO’) under Sections 144C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) for the assessment years 2018- 19.
The Learned Authorised Representative vide letter dated 25.02.2025 has stated that appellant/assessee has availed the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2024 and submitted Form no. 2.
The assessee/appellant has also enclosed the evidence in regard to “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme Act 2024”. So,4 there is no need to keep appeal pending before us in view of the decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Nannusamy Mohan (HUF) vs. ACIT in T.C.A. No.372 of 2020 dated 16.10.2020, wherein the Hon’ble High Court after considering the intention of the assessee to avail the benefit of ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ (VSV scheme), had dismissed the appeal by observing in Para 7 to 9 as under:-
“7. As observed, the assessee is given liberty to restore this appeal in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the declaration to be filed by the assessee under Section 4 of the said Act is not in favour of the assessee. If such a prayer is made, the Registry shall entertain the prayer without insisting upon any application to be filed for condonation of delay in restoration of the appeal and on such request made by the assessee by filing a Miscellaneous Petition for Restoration, the Registry shall place such petition before the Division Bench for orders.
In the light of the above, we direct the appellant/ assessee to file the Form No. 1 on or before 20.11.2020 and the competent authority shall process the application/ declaration in accordance with the Act and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible
preferably within a period of 6 (6) weeks from the date on which the declaration is filed in the proper form. 9. With this declaration, the Tax Case appeal stands disposed of with the aforementioned liberty and Consequently the Substantial Question of Law are left upon. No costs.”
In light of the view taken by Hon’ble Madras High Court cited (supra), we also give liberty to the assessee to get the appeal restored in the event that the assessee does not succeed on the declaration filed by the assessee under Direct Tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2024”. In other words, if the assessee’s declaration filed is not accepted by the Revenue for any reason whatsoever, the assessee can make a prayer before the Bench for recalling of the order by filing a miscellaneous application for restoration of appeal. The Registry will place such petition before the Bench concerned.
In view of the aforesaid observations, we dismiss appeal with liberty to get them recalled in the eventuality of assessee’s declaration not getting accepted by the Revenue.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 21/03/2025.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026