M/S WOODSTOCK LAMINATES LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
Following the precedent of the Hon'ble Madras High Court, the tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. It granted the assessee liberty to restore the appeal by filing a miscellaneous application if the declaration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, is not accepted by the Revenue for any reason.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the Ld. CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2006-07, which originated from an Assessing Officer's order under Sections 143(3) and 147 of the Income-Tax Act. The assessee subsequently availed the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and submitted Form No. 2, providing evidence of this availing.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether an appeal should be dismissed or kept pending when the assessee has opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and to provide a mechanism for restoring the appeal if the scheme declaration is subsequently rejected by the Revenue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “C”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA & SHRI VIMAL KUMAR
PER VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The appeal filed by the Assessee is against order dated 30.11.2025 of the Learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-22, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as ‘Ld. CIT(Appeals)’) under Sections 143(3)/147 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) arising from order dated 21.02.2014 by the Income Tax Officer Ward-18(3), New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the ‘Assessing Officer'), New Delhi for the assessment years 2006-07.
The Learned Authorised Representative vide letter dated 12.03.2025 has stated that appellant/assessee has availed the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2024 and submitted Form no. 2.
The assessee/appellant has also enclosed the evidence in regard to “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme Act 2024”, there is no need to keep appeal pending before us in view of the decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Nannusamy Mohan (HUF) vs. ACIT in T.C.A. No.372 of 2020 dated 16.10.2020, wherein the Hon’ble High Court after considering the intention of the assessee to avail the benefit of ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ (VSV scheme), had dismissed the appeal by observing in Para 7 to 9 as under:-
“7. As observed, the assessee is given liberty to restore this appeal in the event the ultimate decision to be taken on the declaration to be filed by the assessee under Section 4 of the said Act is not in favour of the assessee. If such a prayer is made, the Registry shall entertain the prayer without insisting upon any application to be filed for condonation of delay in restoration of the appeal and on such request made by the assessee by filing a Miscellaneous Petition for Restoration, the Registry shall place such petition before the Division Bench for orders.
In the light of the above, we direct the appellant/ assessee to file the Form No. 1 on or before 20.11.2020 and the competent authority shall process the application/ declaration in accordance with the Act and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible
preferably within a period of 6 (6) weeks from the date on which the declaration is filed in the proper form. 9. With this declaration, the Tax Case appeal stands disposed of with the aforementioned liberty and Consequently the Substantial Question of Law are left upon. No costs.”
In light of the view taken by Hon’ble Madras High Court cited (supra), we also give liberty to the assessee to get the appeal restored in the event that the assessee does not succeed on the declaration filed by the assessee under Direct Tax “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2024”. In other words, if the assessee’s declaration filed is not accepted by the Revenue for any reason whatsoever, the assessee can make a prayer before the Bench for recalling of the order by filing a miscellaneous application for restoration of appeal. The Registry will place such petition before the Bench concerned.
In view of the aforesaid observations, we dismiss appeal with liberty to get them recalled in the eventuality of assessee’s declaration not getting accepted by the Revenue.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 21/03/2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
