NIMISH MALHOTRA ,NEW DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, , NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that in the interest of justice, the matter requires a denovo assessment. The case was remitted back to the Assessing Officer to decide the issues afresh after giving adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) upholding the Assessing Officer's action. The assessee's representative submitted that the AO passed the assessment order without affording proper opportunity.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment order was passed without giving proper opportunity to the assessee, and if so, whether a denovo assessment is warranted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI
(Assessment Year: 2012-13) Nimish Malhotra, vs. ACIT, 13-B, Second Floor, New Delhi. Netaji Subhash Marg, Daryaganj, Delhi – 110 002. (PAN : AJXPM5531E) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Sharad Agarwal, Advocate Ms. Monika Ghai, Advocate REVENUE BY : Shri Amit Katoch, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 21.04.2025 Date of Order : 21.04.2025 O R D E R
PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short] dated 22.11.2023 for the Assessment Year 2012-13.
At the outset, it was submitted by the ld. AR for the assessee that Assessing Officer has passed the assessment order under section 147 r.w.s. 144/143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) without giving proper opportunity to the assessee and Ld. CIT(A) affirmed the action of the AO. Ld. DR relied upon the order of the authorities below.
Considered the rival submissions and perused the material on record. Upon careful consideration, we are of the considered view that in the interest of justice, the matter requires denovo assessment. Therefore, we remit back the issues to the file of the Assessing Officer with the directions to decide the same afresh, after giving adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee, for which Ld. DR has no objection. Assessee is directed through his counsel to fully cooperate with the AO during the proceedings. We hold and direct accordingly.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 21st day of April, 2025 after the conclusion of the hearing.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026