ITO, JAMSHEDPUR vs. M/S ORISSA BENGAL TRANSPORT CO., JAMTARA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s estimation of profit. The Assessing Officer had not provided any comparable cases to justify his higher estimation.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed the CIT(A)'s order which reduced the estimated profit from 3% to 1.5% of gross receipts. The CIT(A) based this reduction on the assessee's previous year's net profit and the declared profit for the current year.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in estimating the profit at 1.5% of gross receipts based on past performance and declared profit, without comparable cases.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI ‘SMC’ BENCH, RANCHI
Before: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RANCHI ‘SMC’ BENCH, RANCHI
(Before Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Accountant Member) I.T.A. No. 62/Ran/2016 Assessment Year: 2012-13 ITO, Ward 1(2)…………………..……………………………………………….……………………Appellant 47, C.H. Area, Jamshedpur. M/s. Orissa Bengal Transport Co..…………………………………………………………Respondent Kitadih (Near TISCO Community Centre) Jamshedpur. [PAN : AABFO 9781 F]
Appearances by: Shri P.K. Mondal, Jr. DR appearing on behalf of the Revenue. None appearing on behalf of the Assessee.
Date of concluding the hearing : February 27, 2018 Date of pronouncing the order : February 28, 2018
ORDER Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM :-
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Jamshedpur dated 08.12.2015 for the assessment year 2012-13.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee. I dispose of the appeal ex-parte on merit qua the assessee. Heard the learned department representative, the revenue disputes the estimate of profit by the Ld. CIT(A) at 1.5% of the gross receipts as against 3% estimated by the A.O. The Ld. CIT(A) has based his estimation on the fact that the net profit of the assessee in the assessment year 2011-12 was 0.4% and for the assessment year 2012-13 was 0.34%. He also took note that in the year under consideration the assessee has declared profit of 1.47%. I find no infirmity in such estimation by the Ld. CIT(A), The A.O. has not based his estimation on any comparable. Thus this appeal of the revenue is dismissed.
In the result the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Ranchi, the 28th day of February, 2018.
Sd/- [J. Sudhakar Reddy] Accountant Member
Dated :28 .02.2018 Biswajit, Sr. PS
2 I.T.A. No. 62/Ran/2016 Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Orissa Bengal Transport Co.
Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. M/s. Orissa Bengal Transport Co. Kitadih (Near TISCO Community Centra), Jamshedpur.
ITO, Ward 1(2), 47, C.H. Area, Jamshedpur.
CIT(A)-
CIT- , 5. CIT(DR), Ranchi Benches, Ranchi.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026