Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi
Per Bench:
The above appeal by Revenue is arising out of order dated 30- 03-2016 of CIT(A), Jamshedpur for the assessment year 2012-13.
At the outset, the ld.AR of the assessee has filed a statement regarding details of taxable amount by way of a tabular form, which is reproduced hereunder:-
Sl. No. Issue Amount 1. Employers Contribution to EPF Rs.2,37,949(2,88.437wrong ly mentioned by department 2. Employers contributions towards ESIC Rs.43,051(55,734 wrongly mentioned by department) 3. No deduction of TDS – 40(a)(ia) Rs.77,800 4. Creditors difference Rs.27,17,249/- Total – Rs.30,76,049 30% of Rs.30,76,049/- = Rs.9,22,814
1 ITA No. 176/Ran/2016
In view of above, he submitted that the appeal filed by the revenue is not maintainable as per CBDT’s prescribed Circular. On the other hand, the ld.DR did not controvert the same.
It is seen from the above that the total tax effect challenged by the Revenue before us is admittedly below the tax effect limit prescribed by CBDT vide Circular No. 21 / 2015 dated 10.12.2015 for preferring appeal(s) before Tribunal by the revenue. It will be pertinent to reproduce the relevant portion of the said Circular No. 21 / 2015 dated 10.12.2015 :-
Henceforth, appeals / SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder:- S.No. Appeals in Income Tax matters Monetary Limit (in Rs) 1 Before Appellate Tribunal 10,00,000/- 2 Before High Court 20,00,000/- 3 Before Supreme Court 25,00,000/- It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. 4. For this purpose, “tax effect” means the difference between the tax on the total income assessed and the tax that would have been chargeable had such total income been reduced by the amount of income in respect of the issues against which appeal is intended to be filed (hereinafter referred to as ‘disputed issues’). However, the tax will not include any interest thereon, except where chargeability of interest itself is in dispute. In case the chargeability of interest is the issue under dispute, the amount of interest shall be the tax effect. In cases where returned loss is reduced or assessed as income, the tax effect would include notional tax on disputed additions. In case of penalty orders, the tax effect will mean quantum of penalty deleted or reduced in the order to be appealed against. 5. The Assessing Officer shall calculate the tax effect separately for every assessment year in respect of the disputed issues in the case of every assessee. If, in the case of an assessee, the disputed issues arise in more than one assessment year, appeal, can be filed in respect of such assessment year or years in which the tax effect in respect of the disputed issues exceeds the monetary limit specified in para 3. No appeal shall be filed in respect of an assessment year or years in which the tax effect is less than the monetary limit specified in para 3. In other words, henceforth, appeals can be filed only with reference to the tax effect in the relevant assessment year. However, in case of a composite order of any High Court or appellate authority, which involves more than one assessment year and common issues in more than one assessment year, appeal shall be filed in respect of all such assessment years even if the ‘tax effect’ is less than the prescribed monetary limits in any of the year(s), if it is decided to file appeal in respect of the year(s) in which ‘tax effect’ exceeds the monetary limit prescribed. In case where a composite order / judgement involves more than one assessee, each assessee shall be dealt with separately. 8. Adverse judgements relating to the following issues should be contested on merits notwithstanding that the tax effect entailed is less than the monetary limits specified in para 3 above or there is no tax effect: (a) Where the Constitutional Validity of the provisions of an Act or Rule are under challenge, or (b) Where Board’s order, Notification, Instruction or Circular has been held to be illegal or ultra vires, or 2 ITA No. 176/Ran/2016
(c) Where Revenue Audit Objection in the case has been accepted by the Department, or (d) Where the addition relates to undisclosed foreign assets / bank accounts.
This instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/ Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn / not pressed. Appeals before the Supreme Court will be governed by the instructions on this subject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed.
In view of the above Circular, we find that the issue challenged by the Revenue in this appeal is below the tax effect, which is prescribed by the Board under Circular dt. 10-12-2015. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed being low tax effect.
In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA No. 176/Ran/2016 for the A.Y 2012-13 is dismissed as not maintainable.
Sd/- Sd/- J. Sudhakar Reddy S.S. Viswanethra Ravi Accountant Member Judicial Member
Dated : 28-02-2018 PP(Sr.P.S.) Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant – The ACIT, Cir-3, 2 Bagmati Road, Northern Town, Jamshedpur 831001. 2 Respondent –M/s. Sokhi Engineering Co. P.Ltd N.S-1, Phase-1, Adityapur Industrial Area, Jamsehdpur-832109. 3. The CIT(A), Ranchi 4. CIT , Ranchi 5. DR, ITAT Ranchi Benches, Ranchi.
/True Copy, By order,
Sr.PS ITAT, Ranchi
3 ITA No. 176/Ran/2016