DCIT, HYDERABAD vs. M/S SEVEN HILLS BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PVT LTD., HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that US branch sales and foreign travel expenses should be excluded from both export and total turnover, following a Supreme Court decision. It also held that TDS must be done irrespective of payment status, but the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) would be eligible for Section 10A exemption.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed exemption under Section 10A for its software development business. The AO reduced export turnover by US branch sales and foreign travel expenses, and disallowed unremitted TDS under Section 40(a)(ia). The CIT(A) granted partial relief.
What were the issues?
Whether US branch sales and foreign travel expenses should be excluded from export and total turnover for Section 10A exemption, and whether unremitted TDS is disallowable under Section 40(a)(ia) and its impact on Section 10A exemption.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd.207 citing330 ITR 175 · 2011 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S.Rifaur Rahman
Per Smt. P. Madhavi Devi, J.M.
Both are cross appeals of the assessee as well as the Revenue for the A.Y 2006-07 against the order of the CIT (A), Guntur, dated 26.02.2010. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee company, engaged in the business of “Software Development”, filed its return of income for the A.Y 2005-06 on 27.11.2006 declaring a ITA Nos 1414 and 756 of 2010 Seven Hills Business Solutions Ltd Hyderabad.
total income of Rs.2,69,837 after claiming exemption of Rs.30,36,34
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10A
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- M/S. Aradhyaa Infra & Holdings Pvt. Ltd… vs ITO, Corp. Ward-1(1), ChennaiITA 1793/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tech Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 2(3), MumbaiITA 7487/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2008-09
- D.C.I.T. Circle 3(3), Mumbai vs Rbs Business Services P. Ltd., MumbaiITA 4467/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
- Rbs Business Services P.Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 3(3), MumbaiITA 4306/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026