INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SYSTEMS,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXCEPTION-2, HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee's activity of water testing, which contributes to public health by ensuring good quality water supply, falls under the advancement of an object of general public utility. The fees collected were almost entirely spent on the testing activity, and the activity was service-oriented rather than profit-driven.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a society registered under Section 12A, claimed exemption under Section 11 for AY 2014-15. The AO denied this exemption, stating that the assessee's activity of water quality testing for the Hyderabad Metro Water Supply and Sewerage Board (HMWSSB) was commercial in nature and not for charitable purposes.
What were the issues?
Whether the activity of water quality testing for a government board, even if fee-based, constitutes a commercial activity or a charitable purpose under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, thereby affecting eligibility for exemption under Section 11.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “A”, HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI B. RAMAKOTAIAH & SHRI V. DURGA RAO
PER V. DURGA RAO, J.M.:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 7th July, 2017 of CIT(A) – 9, Hyderabad for AY 2014-15. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are, assessee is a society formed with effect from 5th December, 1990 and it is registered u/s 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) on 19/12/1990. The memorandum of society is, unless Institute of Health Systems, Hyd. the context otherwise requires, “Health systems” includes the professional, technological, behavioural, social, economic, cultural and other subsystems whose interrelated action contribute to the health of the people. The objects of the assessee are as under: 3. 1.1 To promote and provide for study of health systems, health polic
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026