K. GOVARDHAN REDDY,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-12(2), HYDERABAD
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee's claims for housing loan interest and other deductions under Section 80C were genuine and supported by documentary evidence. The AO was directed to allow these deductions.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a salaried employee, claimed deductions for housing loan interest and other expenses under Sections 24 and 80C. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied these claims ex-parte without clear evidence of notice issuance.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO was justified in denying deductions for housing loan interest and other expenses under Section 80C without proper notice. Whether the assessee's claims were supported by valid documentation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “A” SMC BENCH: HYDERABAD
Before: B. RAMAKOTAIAH
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “A” SMC BENCH: HYDERABAD BEFORE B. RAMAKOTAIAH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA. No.2270/Hyd/2017 Assessment Year: 2011-2012 Shri K. Govardhan Reddy, vs. Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad. Ward-12(2), PAN: AKBPK 5195 R Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee: Shri K.V. Chalamaiah For Revenue : B. Suresh Babu, DR Date of Hearing : 04.07.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 04.07.2018 ORDER PER B. RAMAKOTAIAH, AM.
This is an appeal by assessee against order of CIT (A)-1, Hyderabad dated 18.09.2017 denying certain claims u/s 24 and 80C claimed by the salaried person. 2. Briefly stated, assessee is a salaried employee and filed return of income based on Form 16 given by the employer. Since the case got selected under CASS (reason not specified by A.O.), A.O. completed assessment ex-parte u/s 144 denying claims made by assessee u/s 24 of the interest paid on housing loan and deduction u/s 80C on the payments made to various specified items, which are certified and allowed in Form 16 by the employer. Even though A.O. states that assessee has not responded to the notices, there is no indication of either issuance of notices or even the dates of posting in the order. 3. Before the Ld. CIT(A) assessee furnished the copies of Form 16 issued by employer and certificate from HDFC issued in order to enable
to claim the deduction under IT Act. Surprisingly, Ld. CIT(A) did not allow the claims except one amount of LIC premium. 4. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the evidence placed on record, I am satisfied that the claims made by the assessee are genuine and are supported by Form 16 as well as certificate from HDFC. A.O. is therefore directed to allow the amount of interest Rs. 1,06,279/- as deduction u/s 24 and the claim of housing loan prepayment of Rs. 19,469/- certified by HDFC and PF contribution of Rs. 60,545/- and Children Education Expenditure of Rs. 32,910/- certified by employer u/s 80C. Consequently, the grounds raised in the issues are allowed. 5. In the result, appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 04th July, 2018. Sd/- (B. RAMAKOTAIAH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Hyderabad, Dated: 04th July, 2018. OKK, Sr.PS Copy to 1. K. Govardhan Reddy, H.No. 8-2-598/A/14/1, (New No.470), Opp. Ofen Bakery, road No.10, Banjarahills, Hyderabad-500034. 2. Income Tax Officer, Ward 12(2), Hyderabad. 3. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Hyderabad. 4. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Hyderabad. 5. DR, ITAT, Hyderabad. 6. Guard File
More judgments on Section 24
- Gaurav Jiteshbhai Joshi, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1000/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Ashwin Kumar Rath, Pune vs DCIT (Investigation) Circle 12, PuneITA 791/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Radioactive Hospitality LLP, Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 55/PAT/2026[2023-24]Status: Heard23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Maniam Properties Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs D.C.I.T., CC - 3(2), KolkataITSSA 47/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2016-2017
- Maniam Properties Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs D.C.I.T., CC - 3(2), KolkataITSSA 46/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2015-2016
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026