M/S. JAMADAR BRICKS MFG.CO.,BHARUCH vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1, BHARUCH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that while the rejection of books was justified due to the lack of a stock register, the AO's estimation of gross profit at 25% lacked a proper basis. Therefore, the Tribunal reduced the estimated gross profit rate to 20%.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the assessee's books of accounts for not maintaining a day-to-day stock register for brick manufacturing. Consequently, the AO estimated the gross profit at 25% of the turnover, leading to an addition to the income.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO was justified in rejecting the books of accounts and estimating the gross profit rate without proper basis. The quantum of estimation of gross profit in the absence of quantitative details.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘’SURAT’’ BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
PER AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2008-2009, arises from the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-IV, Baroda, dated 18/10/2012 in proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘’the Act’’.
The solitary ground of assessee is regarding addition of Rs.7,46,951/- made on account of low gross profit.
Briefly stated fact of the case is that return of income declaring income of Rs.4,93,883/- was filed on 17/09/2008. Subsequently, the case was selected for scrutiny by issuing notice u/s.143(2) of the Act, on 28/09/2009
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 145(3)
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs DCIT Central Circle 2(1), MumbaiITA 1952/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 1951/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 1950/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax… vs Pacifica India Projects Private Limited…ITA 2336/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax… vs Pacifica Builders Private Limited, AhmedabadITA 2335/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026