THE ITO, WARD-2(3)(7), SURAT vs. SHRI ASHOK JAIN, SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notice under Section 148 was issued without obtaining prior approval from the competent authority as required by Section 151 of the Act. Therefore, the notice was void ab initio and the assessment order was not sustainable.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessee's assessment for AY 2007-08 based on information regarding bogus purchases. A notice under Section 148 was issued on March 28, 2014, and the approval from the Commissioner was obtained on March 29, 2014.
What were the issues?
Whether the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is void ab initio due to the absence of prior approval from the competent authority as mandated by Section 151.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT– BENCH ‘SURAT’
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT0 MEMBER
PER RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal against order of ld.CIT(A)-3, Surat dated 29.03.2017 for the Asstt.Year 2007-08. 2. Revenue has taken four grounds of appeal, out of which ground no.1 and 2 are the substantial grounds. In ground no.2, it has pleaded that the ld.CIT(A)has erred in holding that notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued by the AO was void ab initio, and therefore, assessment order is not sustainable. In ground no.1, Revenue has pleaded that the ld.CIT(A) has erred in deleting addition of Rs.43,09,98,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026