SHRI SHIRISH P. SHAH,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), SURAT

Similar judgments

Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.

• Shrinivasa A. Pawar, Mumbai vs ACIT ., Range-7(2), Mumbai
  Mumbai16 Oct 2015Partly Allowed

  Also relies on Keval Kuman Jain v. ACIT

  The Tribunal restored the issue of interest expenses to the CIT(A) for re-computation based on a prior year's order. For the deemed dividend issue, the Tribunal directed the AO to re-work accumulated profits, excluding c...

• Vijaydeep Hotels P. Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cen Cir 29, Mumbai
  Mumbai20 Jun 2016Partly Allowed

  Also relies on Keval Kuman Jain v. ACIT

  The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to allow a 15% deduction for the cost of liquor on unaccounted sales, stating that unaccounted sales must originate from unaccounted purchases. The Tribunal also directed the Ass...

• Smt. Jayaben Mathurdas Kaneria, Surat vs The the Income Tax Officer, Ward -1(3)…
  Surat16 Aug 2018Dismissed

  Also relies on Keval Kuman Jain v. ACIT

  The Tribunal held that the benefit of telescoping or peak credit could not be allowed for the cash deposits. The assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the source of the cash deposits, and the exp...

• Smt. Jayaben Mathurdas Kaneria, Surat vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward -1(3), Surat
  Surat16 Aug 2018Dismissed

  Also relies on Keval Kuman Jain v. ACIT

  The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the source of cash deposits, particularly regarding the opening cash balance and the benefit of telescoping. The explanations offe...

• Sumitomo Chemical India P.Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT 1(3)(1), Mumbai
  Mumbai27 Apr 2018Remanded

  Also relies on Keval Kuman Jain v. ACIT

  The Tribunal held that the delay was not caused by negligence or mala fide on the part of the assessee. Following the principles laid down by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal condoned the delay in the interest of justice.