ARUS PROPERTIES LLP,,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., EXEMPT - 1, CIRCLE - 1(1),, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the revenue authorities erred in not considering the correct due date for filing the return for an LLP, which is September 30th as per the LLP Act. Since the assessee filed its return before this due date, it is entitled to carry forward the business loss.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), filed its income tax return declaring a business loss. The CPC processed the return and disallowed carrying forward this loss, stating the return was filed beyond the due date. The CIT(Appeals) upheld this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee-LLP is entitled to carry forward business loss when the return was filed before the due date as per the LLP Act, despite the revenue authorities considering a different due date.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 71,Section 72,Section 139(2),Section 132(9)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Vice-(KZ) & Shri Rajesh Kumar
Per Duvvuru RL Reddy, Vice-President (KZ):- The present appeal is directed at the instance of assessee against the order of ld. Additional /Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Mumbai dated 27th January, 2025 passed for assessment year 2023-24. 1 Arus Properties LLP
Brief facts of the case are that the appellant-assessee is a Limited Liability Partnership. As per the LLP Act, 2008, the appellant maintains regular books of account and s
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 71
- Aurelia Housing Coperative Society Ltd… vs I.T.O., Ward - 49(4), KolkataITA 2198/KOL/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- Sanjeev Chandra, Delhi vs ITO, Ward-52(1), New DelhiITA 5953/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Nipro India Corporation Pvt Ltd, Pune vs DCIT Satara Circle, SataraITA 2723/PUN/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Partha Sarathy Jupudy, Rajahmundry vs ITO, Ward-1, RajahmundryITA 225/VIZ/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Jul 2026AY 2022-23
- Vinod Kumar, Ambala Cantt vs ITO Ward-5, AmbalaITA 173/CHANDI/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed14 Jul 2026AY 2010-11
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026