ITO, WARD-6(1), KOLKATA vs. NEWMOUNT VINIMAY, KOLKATA

Though the Registry has pointed out that the appeal is barred by limitation, however, in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Miscellaneous Application No. 665 of 2021 in SMW(C ) No. 3 of 2020, the period of filing appeal

At the outset ,the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the CBDT has issued a Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, whereby the monetary limits for filing of appeal by the Department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and High Courts and SLP before Supreme Court have been increased as a measure for reducing Litigation. The revised monetary limits laid down in para-2 of this Circular are as follows:

In the present case, the tax effect by the revenue is less than Rs.50,00,000/-. We note that this appeal had been filed by the revenue on 08.02.2021 and since the tax effect is within the monetary limit for filing appeals before Tribunal, in view of theCircular of CBDT (supra) at the first place, Revenue should not have preferred this appeal. In view of the above, we hold that the appeal filed by the Department, against the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A), is contrary to the policy decision of the Department and as such the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed in limine.

As a matter of caution, we observe that if the Revenue finds at a later point of time that the tax effect in the appeal is more than Rs.50 lakhs or despite low tax effect, the appeal of the revenue is maintainable, the revenue is at liberty to move this Tribunal for recalling of this order.