ASHISH BEGWANI,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-06, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The tribunal noted that the assessee had provided a certificate under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and the revenue had no objection.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the CIT(A)'s orders for assessment years 2011-12 to 2017-18. The assessee subsequently opted to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeals should be withdrawn due to the assessee's settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The tribunal considered the assessee's request and the revenue's non-objection.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI K.N. CHAR SHRI K.N. CHARYSHRI SHRI
PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU VP VP : VP These appeals filed by the assessee against the order of the learned CIT(A)-24, New Delhi, all dated 09.05.2019, for the assessment years 2011-12 to 2017-18 respectively.
The learned counsel for the assessee, vide letter dated 30.12.2020, has requested for withdrawal of the appeals filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.
Learned Senior DR has no objection.
2 ITA-7220 TO 7226 /Del/2019
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeals.
In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Above decision was announced in the presence of both the sides on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 31st December, 2020.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026