DCIT vs. M/S GOKULDAS IMAGES PVT. LTD.,
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the present appeals were not connected to the issue remanded by the High Court. Therefore, they were dismissed as infructuous.
What were the facts?
The appeals were wrongly tagged with another case. The High Court had remanded an issue regarding a Rs. 7 Crores advance to a sister concern for verification of commercial expediency.
What were the issues?
Whether the present appeals are infructuous due to their disconnection from a High Court remanded issue.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “C” BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI B.R. BASKARAN & SMT BEENA PILLAI
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
& C.O. No. 97/Bang/2013 (in Assessment Year : 2008-09 (By Assessee) Assessee by : Shri Ashok A Kulkarni, Advocate Revenue by : Shri Pradeep Kumar, CIT (DR) Date of Hearing : 29.11.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 30.11.2021 ORDER PER BENCH Present appeals were wrongly tagged along with as all these appeals pertained to the same Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. Hon’ble High Court by order dated 02.11.2020 passed in ITA 77/2015 had remanded the issue to verify the commercial Page 2 of C.O. No. 97/Bang/2013 expediency of payment amounting to Rs. 7 Crores advanced by assessee to M/s. Hinduja Investments Pvt. Ltd. which is a sister concern. This issue has been raised by assessee only in being the appeal filed by assessee against order passed by Ld.CIT(A) dated 25.02.2013.
The other two appeals hereinabove being appeal filed by revenue and the Cross Objection filed by assessee in revenue’s appeal does not have any connection with the issue remanded by Hon’ble High Court for adjudication. In view of the above, present appeals are dismissed as infructuous as they do not arise out of the order passed by the Hon’ble High Court (supra). In the result, the appeal by revenue and the cross objection by assessee stands dismissed as infructuous. Order pronounced in open court on 30th November, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026