ICF SILVER JUBILEE NURSERY & PRIMARY SCHOOL,CHENNAI vs. DCIT NON CORP WARD 10(1), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) should be considered for each educational institution separately, provided its annual receipts do not exceed Rs. 1 crore. The CIT(A) erred in confirming the denial of exemption.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a society running two educational institutions (Nursery and Primary schools), claimed exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) denied this exemption, aggregating the receipts of both schools.
What were the issues?
Whether the aggregate annual receipts of multiple educational institutions run by a society can be considered for exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad), or if each institution should be assessed individually.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 10(23C)(iiiad), Rule 2BC
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Children’s Education Society42 citing358 ITR 373 · 2013 · HC
- Indian Vaccines Corporation Ltd. v. ITO 2010-TIOL-587 ITAT Del and in Jat Education Society vs. DCIT (ITAT, Del)14 citing10 Taxmann.com 127 · 2011 · HC
- 205 ITD Param Hans Swami Uma Bharti Mission v. ACIT10 citing34 Taxmann.com 285 · 2013 · HC
- Pawan Hans Swami Uma Bharti Mission v. ACIT3 citing29 Taxmann.com 223 · 2013 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, HON’BLE & SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA, HON’BLE
PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal by the assessee is filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, for the assessment year 2018-19, vide order dated 20.11.2023
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. “The Order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) relevant to the AY 2018-19 dt. 20.11.20
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026