MR.JAYARAM SUBRAMANAIAM,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the doctrine of merger does not apply in this case because both the order under section 143(1) and section 143(3) are appealable orders and can be contested independently. The CIT(A) was correct in dismissing the appeal as the assessee was aggrieved by the order under section 143(1) and not the order under section 143(3).
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) which dismissed the appeal in limine. The appeal was delayed by 64 days, which was condoned by the tribunal. The assessee's primary contention was the invalidity of the assessment order passed by the National E-Assessment Center, Chennai, and the subsequent dismissal by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the doctrine of merger applies to orders passed under Section 143(1) and 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, and whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal without adjudicating the grounds on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(1),Section 143(3),Section 246(1)(a)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & HON’BLE SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA
PER AMITABH SHUKLA, A.M :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order bearing DIN & Order No.ITBA / APL / S / 250 / 2024-25 / 1067869903(1) dated 22.08.2024 of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax [herein after “CIT(A), for the assessment years 2018-19. 2.0 It has been noted that there is a delay of 64 days in the case, in filing of this appeal before the tribunal. In its affid
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026