JOY OF SHARING FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD-4,, CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Ld.CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal based on a ground not raised by the CPC, and that the assessee had indeed filed the audit report (Form 10B) on time, which disclosed the accumulated income. The Tribunal relied on a High Court decision where late filing of Form 10 did not disentitle the trust from exemption.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, filed its return of income for AY 2022-23 along with an audit report (Form 10B) and Form 10 (accumulation of income) by the due date. However, the CPC disallowed the claimed accumulation of Rs. 54 lakhs, stating Form 10 was not filed. The assessee claimed it was due to technical glitches during upload.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of accumulated income is justified when the audit report was filed on time and the issue of Form 10 filing was due to technical glitches and not raised by the CPC.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11(2),Section 139(1),Section 12AB,Section 143(1),Section 11
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA
आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:
1. This is an appeal preferred by the assessee Trust against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/Addl./JCIT (A)-1, (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”), Jaipur, dated 27.09.2024 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as "AY”) 2022-23.
The main grievance of the assessee is against the action of the Ld.CIT(A) disallowing the accumulation of income u/s.11(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act‘) on the ground that Form 10B was not filed within the due date u/s.139(1) of the Act.
The brief facts are that the assessee is a public Charitable Trust formed on 21.10.2010 u/s.12AB of the Act has been regularly filing his return of income (RoI) along with the Audit Report in Form 10B. For AY 2022-23, the assessee had filed the RoI on 07.09.2022 along with Audit Report (Form 10B) admitting ‘Nil’ income. According to the assessee, while filing RoI & Audit Report, the assessee Trust uploaded Form 10 [accumulation of income] and was of the bona fide belief that it has uploaded the Form 10 in the Income Tax Portal, but to its dismay when the return was processed by the CPC, and intimation dated 31.03.2023 was passed, it came as a shock to the assessee that accumulation of income to the tune of Rs.54 lakhs has been denied, for not uploading the Form 10. Realizing that, may be due to technical glitches, Form 10 couldn’t have been uploaded electronically when RoI was filed on 07.09.2022 u/s.139(1), the assessee again refilled the Form 10 on 02.06.2023 and pointed out that the omission in filing Form No.10 [i.e.
accumulation of income u/s.11(2) of the Act to the tune of Rs.54 lakhs] was purely on account of complexity while uploading the said Form while uploading the RoI & Audit Report in Form 10B.
Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld.CIT(A)/JCIT(A) against the action of the CPC denying the claim of the assessee Trust, which was dismissed on the ground that for claiming exemption u/s.11 of the Act, it is mandatory to file Form No.10B i.e. Audit Report within the specified time.
Aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal.
We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. It is noted that the assessee is a public Charitable Trust formed in the year 2010 and was enjoying registration u/s.12AB of the Act and carrying on charitable activities. The assessee Trust is noted to have filed its RoI for AY 2022-23 on 07.09.2022 u/s.139(1) of the Act admitting ‘Nil’ income along with mandatory Form 10B i.e. Audit Report. In the RoI filed on 07.09.2022, the assessee Trust is noted to have duly disclosed under Schedule-I, the details of amount accumulated as per sec.11(2) of the Act as well as the same was duly disclosed in Form No.10B (Audit Report) at Column Nos.5 & 6 [refer Annexure-B] wherein we note that the sum of Rs.54 lakhs has been clearly mentioned therein as amount accumulated as per sec.11(2) of the Act. It is further noted that the assessee Trust while filing the ITR on 07.09.2022 has uploaded the Audit Report in Form No.10B [which was well before the due date u/s.139(1) of the Act] but the CPC in its intimation u/s.143(1) of the Act on 31.03.2023 has disallowed the accumulation of income of Rs.54 lakhs, only on the reason that assessee Trust didn’t file Form No.10 [accumulation of income].
According to the assessee, while uploading RoI & Audit Report [Form 10B], the assessee also uploaded Form 10 [accumulation of income] and was of the bona fide belief that it has uploaded the Form 10 in the Income Tax Portal, but to its dismay when the return was processed by the CPC, and intimation dated 31.03.2023 was passed, it came to know that accumulation of income of Rs.54 lakhs has been denied, for not uploading the Form 10. The assessee Trust is noted to have re-filed/uploaded Form No.10 on 02.06.2023; and during the appellate proceedings before the Ld.CIT(A), has brought to his notice that the assessee Trust had filed/uploaded return as well as Audit Report in Form No.10B before the due date u/s.139(1) of the Act i.e. on 07.09.2022 as well as Form No.10 was uploaded, but due to technical glitches, it was unsuccessful and since, there was heavy load server got hung and which resulted in CPC rejecting the accumulation of Rs.54 lakhs.
And assessee had again re-filed/uploaded on 02.06.2023 and a copy of Form No.10 has been filed before us. However, we note that the Ld.CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee albeit on a different reason that for claiming exemption u/s.11 of the Act, it is mandatory to file Form No.10B before the due date of filing of return or should have got condonation of delay for belated filing of Form No.10B from the CIT (Exemption). However, we find that this findings of fact recorded by the Ld.CIT(A) is erroneous for the simple fact that the assessee had filed the Form 10B (audit-report) before the due date u/s.139(1) of the Act i.e. on 07.09.2022 and the CPC has refused accumulation of income u/s.11(2) of the Act only on the reason that Form No.10 [accumulation of income] has not been filed. Thus, we find that the Ld.CIT(A) has misdirected himself on the erroneous assumption that assessee Trust didn’t file Form No.10B [i.e. Audit Report] when the correct fact is that assessee Trust had filed the Audit Report in Form No.10B along with the RoI on 07.09.2022.
Thus, impugned action of the Ld.CIT(A) cannot be countenenced and need to be interfered with.
As discussed, the Ld.CIT(A) erred in rejecting the appeal on the ground which was not raised/flagged by the CPC i.e. non-filing of Form 10 [accumulation of income of a Trust] whereas the Ld.CIT(A) has denied the accumulation of income only on the ground that the assessee Trust didn’t file the Form No.10B [i.e. Audit Report]. We find that the assessee Trust has filed the RoI along with Audit Report before the due date u/s.139(1) of the Act and in the RoI as well as the Audit Report has clearly shown the accumulation of income u/s.11(2) of the Act to the tune of Rs.54 lakhs.
In such a scenario, we are of the view that the Income Tax Authorities while processing the return for assessment/appellate order ought not to have rejected the accumulation of income on the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case. In this regard, we refer to the decision of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT v. SPIC Educational Foundation (TCA No.1593 of 2008 dated 12.12.2018), wherein the Hon’ble High Court has held that filing of Form 10 for accumulation of income u/s.11(2) of the Act which was filed beyond due date couldn’t disentitle the trust from exemption claimed u/s.11 of the Act. The Hon’ble Court directed the AO to examine the benefit of admissibility rather than to foreclose the claim of assessee on technicalities. Therefore, respectfully taking note of the binding decision of the Hon’ble High Court (supra), we hold that the Ld.CIT(A) erred by misdirecting on an issue which wasn’t raised by CPC; and since the TAR had been filed along with RoI filed within due date u/s.139(1) of the Act, and Form No.10 was again uploaded by the assessee on 02.06.2023, we are of the view that the First Appellate Authority erred in passing the impugned order, which we set aside and direct the CPC/AO to allow the accumulation of income claimed by the assessee u/s.11(2) of the Act to the tune of Rs.54 lakhs.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced on the 23rd day of April, 2025, in Chennai.
More judgments on Section 11(2)
- Kammavari Sangham (Regd), Bengaluru vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1181/BANG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi vs Income Tax Exemption, Ward 1(2), New DelhiITA 1516/DEL/2026[2012 - 2013]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026
- Rkkr Foundation, Chandigarh vs DCIT, Exemption Circle 1, ChandigarhITA 477/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Rkkr Foundation, Chandigarh vs DCIT, Exemption Circle 1, ChandigarhITA 477/CHANDI/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Imc Society of Iti Govt Central Crafts… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward…ITA 1850/CHANDI/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026