YOUNG BODHISATYA SOCIETY INDIA,LUCKNOW vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution as the assessee did not appear for the hearing and seemed uninterested in pursuing the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against the rejection of its application for approval under Section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee did not appear for the hearing despite notice being sent.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be dismissed for non-prosecution when the appellant fails to appear for the hearing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
- Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar v. CWT2,040 citing223 ITR 480 · 1997 · HC
- CIT v. B.N. Bhattacharya & Another1,656 citing118 ITR 461 · 1997 · SC
- New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT351 citing296 ITR 495 · 2008 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH “B”, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. A. D. JAIN & SHRI T. S. KAPOOR
PER A. D. JAIN, V.P.: This is assessee’s appeal against the order of the ld. CIT (Exemption), Lucknow, dated 23/4/2018, rejecting the application of the assessee for approval under section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. This appeal was taken up for hearing on 22/8/2019, but none has appeared on behalf of the assessee, despite issuance of notice through RPAD, which has been returned unserved by the postal authorities with the remark “the door of the addressee’s house is under lock for a long period. At present no one reside at the given address.
Hence returned.” The notice was sent to the assessee on the address given in form No.
Since the assessee did not appear, it appears that the assessee is not interested
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)(vi)
- Samvedna Foundation Trust, Agra vs ITO, Ward Exemption, AgraITA 496/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Sri Vrindavana Gokula Charitable Trust… vs CIT (Exemptions), BengaluruITA 1554/BANG/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Creative Foundation, Nandurbar vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)…ITA 1502/PUN/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Ladali Goshala Seva Sanstha, Daund vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), PuneITA 641/PUN/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2025-2026
- The Pyramid Spiritual Trust (Hyderabad)… vs ITO (Exemption) Ward 1(3), HyderabadITA 346/HYD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed2 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026