SHREE FUELS AND MINERALS,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and restored all issues back to the CIT(A)'s file. This was done to provide the assessee with a reasonable opportunity to present its defense.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was filed against the CIT(A)'s order. The CIT(A) had passed the order ex parte in the absence of the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order passed ex parte without providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee is valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA
आदेश/O R D E R
PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-9, Ahmedabad (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 01.12.2017 arising in the assessment order dated 14.10.2016 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144/145 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning assessment year 2014-15.
ITA No. 401/Ahd/18 [Shree Fuels and Minerals vs. DC IT] A.Y. 2014-15 - 2 - 2. The assessee has taken several grounds of appeal seeking to challenge the order of the CIT(A). However, on perusal of the order of the CIT(A), we notice that the CIT(A) has passed the order ex parte in the absence of the assessee. Therefore, we consider it appropriate that a reasonable opportunity is given to the assessee to place its defense before the CIT(A) to enable the First Appellate Authority to pass speaking order after taking cognizance of the merits of the case as may be advanced on behalf of the assessee. Therefore, we consider it appropriate to set aside the order of the CIT(A) and restore all the issues back to the file of the CIT(A) in larger interest of justice with a view to enable the assessee to avail opportunity once more. Needless to say, the assessee shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before CIT(A) without any demur, failing which, the CIT(A) shall be at liberty to conclude the appellate proceedings in accordance with law. Hence, the order of the CIT(A) is set aside and all the issues raised in the captioned appeal are restored back to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication in accordance with law after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
This Order pronounced in Open Court on 05/07/2018
Sd/- Sd/- (MADHUMITA ROY) (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 05/07/2018 True Copy S. K. SINHA आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज�व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT
ITA No. 401/Ahd/18 [Shree Fuels and Minerals vs. DC IT] A.Y. 2014-15 - 3 - 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद ।
More judgments on Section 145
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- ACIT, Circle-49(1), New Delhi vs Kuldeep Chhabra, New DelhiITA 6507/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- ACIT, Circle-49(1), New Delhi vs Kuldeep Chhabra, New DelhiITA 6506/DEL/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Mintu Lal, Ranchi vs Assessing Officer, RanchiITA 140/RAN/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Ontic Finserve Limited, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward -3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1924/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026