SHRI VINOD KUMAR AGARWAL,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER- 4(5), LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was not given a proper and sufficient opportunity of being heard by the CIT(A). Therefore, the order of the CIT(A) was set aside and the appeal was restored to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against the order of the CIT(A). The assessee did not appear before the ITAT despite notice, and the appeal was heard ex-parte. The CIT(A) had also passed an ex-parte order as the assessee did not appear before him.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without providing a proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH”SMC“, LUCKNOW
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of learned CIT(A)-2, Lucknow, dated 31/5/2019 pertaining to assessment year 2011-12. 2. None has appeared on behalf of the assessee, despite issuance of notice through RPAD, which has not returned unserved. However, I find that this appeal can be disposed of in the absence of the assessee. Therefore, I am proceeding to dispose of the appeal after hearing the ld. D.R. and after considering the material placed on record.
I have heard the rival parties and have gone through the material placed on record. I noted that learned CIT(A) has passed ex- parte order as, according to him, nobody has appeared on the dates when the appeal was fixed for hearing before him. From the order of CIT(A), it is apparent that the CIT(A) had issued various notices to the assessee however, n
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026