THE BRAHMKSHATRIYA CO. OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(2), AHMEDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 34/AHD/2017Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad17 August 2018AY 2014-153 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the technical delay in filing the appeal electronically and directed the CIT(A) to admit the appeal for disposal on merits. The assessee was granted 30 days to file the e-appeal.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed a manual appeal before the CIT(A) instead of an electronic appeal as required by amended rules. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal as defective and non-maintainable.

What were the issues?

Whether a manually filed appeal, when electronic filing is mandated, is maintainable and if the delay in electronic filing should be condoned.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 249

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA & SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMEBR

For Appellant: Shri Jimi Patel, A.R, Shri James Kurian, Sr. D.R

आदेश/O R D E R

PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM:

The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Ahmedabad (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 21.10.2016 under s. 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning assessment year 2014-15.

ITA No. 34/Ahd/17 [The Brahmkshatriya Co.Op. Housing Society Ltd. vs. ITO] - 2 -

2.

In the captioned appeal, the assessee is aggrieved by the action of the CIT(A) in dismissing the appeal before it as defective and non- maintainable and thus refused to adjudicate the appeal on merits.

3.

On perusal of the order of the CIT(A), it is noticed that the assessee had filed paper appeal manually before CIT(A) instead of filing appeal electronically as amended under Rules 45 of I.T. Rules 1962 w.e.f. 01/03/2016. The CIT(A) thus observed that it was incumbent upon the assessee to file appeal electronically to pursue remedy available before him. The CIT(A) thereafter observed that the case of the assessee is covered by provisions of section 249 r.w.Rule 45 of I.T.Rules, 1962 which lays down that every appeal shall be filed in the prescribed form and shall be verified in the prescribed manner. The CIT(A) accordingly found that the paper appeal so filed by the assessee is defective appeal and non-maintainable for adjudication of appeal. The CIT(A) accordingly dismissed the appeal of the assessee as defective and non-maintainable.

4.

In the context, we note that the assessee has duly filed the paper appeal which was receipted by the office of the CIT(A) on 28/03/2016. We also take note of the fact that assessee has also filed e-appeal on 09.07.2016 with a request to the CIT(A) for condonation of delay. In these circumstances and having regard to the fact that e-filing was introduced about that time in the vicinity of paper appeal filed by the assessee, it is quite possible that assessee may not be conversant with technical aspects. The breach committed by the assessee is clearly of technical nature. We are thus of the considered opinion that a benign view be taken in the circumstances. Therefore, we consider it appropriate to grant opportunity to assessee for disposal of appeal in accordance with law. We thus direct the CIT(A) to admit the e-appeal for its disposal on merits.

ITA No. 34/Ahd/17 [The Brahmkshatriya Co.Op. Housing Society Ltd. vs. ITO] - 3 -

5.

The assessee therefore shall be entitled to file the appeal electronically afresh (if not filed so far) within 30 days of service of this order for adjudication on merits. Intervening technical delay in filing the appeal as per the prescribed method stands condoned. The matter is remanded back to the file of CIT(A) for adjudication of issues.

6.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

This Order pronounced in Open Court on 21/08/2018

Sd/- Sd/- (MAHAVIR PRASAD) (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 21/08/2018 True Copy S. K. SINHA आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. राज�व / Revenue 2. आवेदक / Assessee 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त- अपील / CIT (A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड� फाइल / Guard file. By order/आदेश से,

उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, अहमदाबाद ।

More judgments on Section 249

All 507 judgments and leading authorities on Section 249 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →