THE ITO, WARD 2(6), BARODA vs. SHRI VIPUL ANANDLAL SHAH, BARODA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1149/AHD/2015Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad18 September 2018AY 2008-094 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as not maintainable, applying the CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018 which mandates dismissal of appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 20 lacs.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed against the deletion of disallowances made on account of unexplained cash credits and cash deposits. The tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs. 20 lacs.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable given the low tax effect as per CBDT circular.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “B” BENCH

Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI WASEEM AHMED

Pronounced: 18/09/2018

PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeal)-5, Vadodara [CIT(A) in short] vide appeal no.CAB/11-67/13-14 dated 12-12-2014 arising in the matter of assessment order passed under s.143(3) r.ws. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961(here-in-after referred to as "the Act") dated 28.03.2013 relevant to Assessment Year (AY) 2008-09. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue are as under:-

“i. In deleting the disallowance of Rs.17,00,000/- made on account of unexplained cash credits ignoring the fact that the creditworthiness and identification remained to be established. ii. In deleting the addition to the tune of Rs.41,92,720/- made on account of cash deposits without appreciating several defects pointed out by AO in the assessment order..”

3.

At the time of the hearing, we observe that the tax effect in the appeal filed by the Revenue is less than Rs. 20 lacs. As per the Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11/07/2018 issued by CBDT recently all pending appeals filed by Revenue are liable to be dismissed/ withdrawn/ not pressed to reduce the litigation where the tax effect does not exceed the prescribed monetary limit, i.e., Rs.20 Lacs. The relevant extract of the circular is reproduced below:

“2. In supersession of the above Circular, it has been decided by the Board that departmental appeals may be filed on merits before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and High Courts and SLPs/ appeals before Supreme Court keeping in view the monetary limits and conditions specified below.

3.

Henceforth, appeals/ SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder:

S. Appeals/ SLPs in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit No. (Rs.)

1.

Before Appellate Tribunal 20,00,000

2.

Before High Court 50,00,000

3.

Before Supreme Court 1,00,00,000

The monetary limit for filing the appeals by the Revenue before the Tribunal has been increased to Rs. 20 Lacs. It is also clarified in the said Circular that the said monetary limit is applicable retrospectively even to the appeals pending before the Tribunal. The CBDT has also instructed that such pending appeals below this specified tax limit of Rs.20 lacs may be withdrawn / not pressed.

In the case on hand, it was noticed that the tax effect on the disputed issue raised by the Revenue is claimed to be less Rs.20 Lacs. Therefore appeal of the Revenue is required to be dismissed in limine in terms of the above circular.

4.

The Ld. DR for the Revenue fairly agreed on the applicability of the CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018. Accordingly, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as not maintainable. However, the Revenue is at the liberty to move the miscellaneous application to recall the order if the tax effect exceeds the threshold limit or the case of the Revenue falls in any of the exception provided in the aforesaid CBDT Circular in any manner. The MA shall be filed within the prescribed time. Hence the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.

5.

In the result, the appeal filed by the department is dismissed. This Order pronounced in Open Court on 18/09/2018 (RAJPAL YADAV) (WASEEM AHMED) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Ahmedabad; Dated 18/09/2018 Priti Yadav, Sr.PS आदेश क" ""त"ल"प अ"े"षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ" / The Appellant

2.

""यथ" / The Respondent. 3. संबं"धत आयकर आयु"त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु"त(अपील) / The CIT(A)

5.

"वभागीय ""त"न"ध, आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण / DR, ITAT, 6. गाड" फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →