DEVESHBHAI DILIPBHAI GANDHI,VADODARA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3), VADODARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in limine due to the assessee's non-appearance and lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal. The assessee retains the liberty to seek recall of the order if prevented by sufficient cause.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was listed for hearing, but neither the assessee nor their representative appeared. No adjournment application was filed despite proper notice being served.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's failure to appear for the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “SMC” BENCH
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD & SHRI WASEEM AHMED
PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Vadodara dated 01.02.2016 pertaining to A.Y. 2007-08.
ITA No. 1266/Ahd/2016 2 . A.Y. 2007-08 2. On the date of hearing i.e. on 19-09-2018, none appeared on behalf of Assessee nor an adjournment application was filed on behalf of the Assessee though the notice fixing the date of hearing was served on Assessee, which indicates that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal, therefore, following the decision of ITAT Delhi Bench in the case of CIT Vs Multiplan India (Pvt.) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del), we dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. The assessee shall however be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for recalling of this order, if prevented by sufficient cause for non-appearance on the date of hearing.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in Open Court on 25 - 09- 2018
Sd/- Sd/- (WASEEM AHMED) (MAHAVIR PRASAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER True Copy JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad: Dated 25 /09/2018 Rajesh Copy of the Order forwarded to:- 1. The Appellant. 2. The Respondent. 3. The CIT (Appeals) – 4. The CIT concerned. 5. The DR., ITAT, Ahmedabad. 6. Guard File. By ORDER
Deputy/Asstt.Registrar ITAT,Ahmedabad
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026