SRI MAHARAJA REFINERIES,ERODE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-I,, ERODE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment order was passed beyond the prescribed time limit under Section 153(5) of the Income Tax Act. It also noted that the AO failed to provide the assessee with a copy of the Department of Economic Affairs report, violating principles of natural justice.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in import/export of palm oil, faced scrutiny for its low net profit and large expenses. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions based on a report from the Department of Economic Affairs and a reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). The ITAT had previously restored the matter to the AO for examination under Section 40A(2)(b) after finding the TPO reference invalid.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment order was passed within the time limit prescribed by Section 153(5) and whether the assessee was denied natural justice due to non-disclosure of crucial documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153(5),Section 40A(2)(b),Section 143(3),Section 92CA,Section 144B,Section 151A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI
PER MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM: The captioned appeals filed by the assessee are directed against separate orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)(NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] both dated 07.06.2024 for Assessment Years 2013-14 & 2014-15. Since the facts and issues are common in these appeals, they are heard together and disposed off by this common order. ITA No.1955/Chny/2024 : (A.Y. 2013-1
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153(5)
- M/S. Biesse Manufacturing Company Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITTPA 398/BANG/2023[2009-10]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2009-10
- Etisalat Software Solutions P. Ltd… vs ACIT, Circle-2(2)(1), BengaluruITA 92/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2017-18
- Town Vividoddesha Sahakari Bhandara… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 & Tps, TumkuruITA 2457/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed20 Aug 2026AY 2017-18
- K R Pradeep, Bangalore vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central…ITA 428/BANG/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- Leighton India Contractors Pvt Ltd., Mumbai vs DCIT, Cir-14(1)(1), MumbaiITA 896/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed27 Jul 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026