ILJIN AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED,,KANCHIPURAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to provide the assessee with a reasonable opportunity of being heard before passing the rectification orders, which enhanced the assessment. This violation of statutory procedure under Section 154(3) rendered the rectification orders invalid.
What were the facts?
The assessee company filed appeals challenging rectification orders passed under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act. The core issue was the alleged violation of natural justice due to the absence of a proper opportunity to be heard before the rectification orders were passed.
What were the issues?
Whether rectification orders passed under Section 154 are valid when the mandatory notice and opportunity of hearing to the assessee were not provided, thereby violating principles of natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 154,Section 143(3),Section 155(4)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- M Chockalingam & M. Meyyappan v. CIT27 citing48 ITR 34 · 1963 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: These are appeals preferred by the assessee company against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC,
(hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”), Delhi, all dated 19.03.2024
for the Assessment Years (hereinafter referred to as "AY”) 2016-17 to 2018-19. ITA Nos.1494 to 1496/Chny/2
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026